Total Students
34
Pass Rate
85.3%
Average Score
82.1
Top Score
98
Median Score
86.5
Std Deviation
16.8
Grade Conversion Formula:
=LOOKUP(E6,{0,1,65,69,73,77,81,85,89,93,97,100,101},{"FAIL","FAIL","E","D","D+","C","C+","B","B+","A","A+","A+"})
Grading Scale
| Score Range | Grade | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 97 - 100 | A+ | Excellent |
| 93 - 96 | A | Excellent |
| 89 - 92 | B+ | Very Good |
| 85 - 88 | B | Good |
| 81 - 84 | C+ | Above Average |
| 77 - 80 | C | Average |
| 73 - 76 | D+ | Below Average |
| 69 - 72 | D | Below Average |
| 65 - 68 | E | Poor |
| 0 - 64 | FAIL | Fail |
Top Performers
#1
MUHAYYA FAHAD M ALDAWSARI
98
#2
MANSOUR MOHAMMED M ALBISHI
98
#3
MESHARI ABDULRAHMAN A ALSAIF
96
#4
FAHAD MOHAMMED M ALSHARARI
97
#5
ABDULLAH MUTRIK S ALYAMI
95
Key Insights & Analysis
85.3% of students passed the course, indicating overall effectiveness of the training program.
The average score of 82.1 suggests that most students performed well above the passing threshold.
Group 4 students showed slightly better performance with an average score of 84.8 compared to Group 3's 79.9.
The top 5 students scored between 96-98, demonstrating exceptional understanding of the course material.
Consider additional support for the 5 students who failed, as their scores (26-52) indicate significant gaps in understanding.
The standard deviation of 16.8 indicates a wide spread of scores, suggesting varied levels of student preparedness.
Recommendations
Provide additional tutoring sessions for students who scored below 65 to improve their understanding.
Analyze the performance difference between Group 3 and Group 4 to identify best practices.
Consider revising the course material for topics where students scored poorly.
Recognize and reward top performers to motivate other students.
Implement pre-assessment tests to identify students who may need additional support early in the course.
Performance Metrics
Grade Distribution
A Grades
35.3%
B Grades
32.4%
C Grades
14.7%
D Grades
2.9%
E Grades
0%
Fail
14.7%
Score Distribution
90-100
38.2%
80-89
32.4%
70-79
14.7%
60-69
0%
50-59
5.9%
0-49
8.8%
Group Comparison
Group 3: 23 students, 78.3% pass rate, average score 79.9
Group 4: 16 students, 93.8% pass rate, average score 84.8
Difference: Group 4 performed 15.5% better in pass rate and scored 4.9 points higher on average.
Analysis: Group 4 showed significantly better performance, suggesting more effective instruction or better student preparation.
Grade Distribution
Score Distribution
Pass/Fail Analysis
Group Comparison
Student Data
Grade Distribution
Grade Distribution (Bar Chart)
Grade Distribution (Pie Chart)
Score Distribution
Score Histogram
Score Distribution Curve
Pass/Fail Analysis
Pass/Fail Distribution
Pass/Fail Percentage
Group Comparison
Group Performance Comparison
Group Grade Distribution
Student Performance Data
| SID | Name | Group | Score | Grade | Status |
|---|